Skip to main content

Female characters please?

 After reading Brave New World and seeing the openness of Huxley's futuristic society towards female equality and empowerment, I was optimistic for similar trends in 1984. Boy, have I been disappointed. 

Our only real female character is Julia, who serves as a distraction, an object of desire, and a companion for Winston that won't make him look stupid or less important. She is essentially a fantasy for Winston - a beautiful woman who he can sleep with and then plot to take down the Party with. She comes across as naïve because rebellion looks different to her than it does to Winston, and we never see her as an individual outside of the male gaze. I know that it was common for female characters during this time to exist only within the context of the men, but Orwell is writing a book that takes place in the future. If he can be so creative with his envisioning of a dystopian world, surely he can find the imaginative capacity to see women as more than toys for men.

Do you think Orwell should have given more power/autonomy to female characters, or do you think that the current experiences of female characters align with the gender roles in Oceania?

Comments

  1. Rani Ramrattan25 February 2021 at 07:39

    I think Orwell should have but although this is set in the future much of the mindset of society remains in the past in 1984

    ReplyDelete
  2. L. Moffitt25 February 2021 at 07:40

    AGREE. This misogyny of this novel is troublesome. None of the female characters is sympathetic or dimensional in the least. To some degree, that could be Orwell (like Huxley) commenting on how women often have it worse in totalitarian regimes, but I agree that a lot of it is probably Orwell's own sexism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Katelyn25 February 2021 at 07:41

    I've been personally really disappointed with Julia's characterization as she doesn't even pretend to evolve the plot (at least not this far into the book). She truly is there just to have sex with Winston and make him look good in his form of rebellion compared to her's. She could easily have taken over the O'Brien character, but instead we are left with our only significant female character of the book being very much the "Eve" to Winston's "Adam" in some ways.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Prithika Ravi25 February 2021 at 07:42

    I think that, yes, to some extent, what he does aligns with the gender roles in Oceania, but he's the one who made those gender roles. It would have been really interesting to see him undermine the traditional aspects of a dystopian novel, especially as a lot of this was inspired by BNW, and incorporate some unexpected aspect of equalizing them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Alice Gao25 February 2021 at 07:52

    It definitely is extremely sad, because Orwell has taken care to twist the idea of motherhood and sexuality in the world of 1984, but for some reason doesn't seem comfortable giving the women any power. None of the high rank Party members are male. Julia works in a freaking porn shop, and all of Winston's coworkers are male. I think given Orwell's own biases (as Ms. Moffitt said) there was no way he would give women quality representation in a book such as this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous25 February 2021 at 07:56

    I think what's really interesting about this is the way that the gender roles in Oceania seem to be somewhat inclusive - both women and men can reach the upper echelon of the inner party, and all "comrades" in the Party are equal. And yet, Orwell inexplicably wrote his only significant female character in a way that aligns much better with the gender roles in Orwell's 1948 than Winston's 1984.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. L. Moffitt25 February 2021 at 08:09

      Good point, and it's interesting that this has played out in real life as well. Totalitarian regimes in our world have claimed that the sexes are equal, but women inevitably end up in subservient roles.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Disney perpetuates voodoo stereotypes

In the opening chapters of Mumbo Jumbo , we've been introduced to Papa DaBas, a voodoo priest. In class we talked a bit about the largely negatively perception of voodoo in America. This immediately made me think of the Disney princess film, The Princess and the Frog . This movie is set in New Orleans, and follows a princess who falls in love, blah blah blah...but the villain is a voodoo-practicing witch doctor, Dr. Facilier.  I found it really interesting to look back at Dr. Facilier's character after discussing the American perception of voodoo, because Dr. Facilier is portrayed as a man of pure evil (here's a picture if you haven't seen the movie to show how creepy he is). His soul belongs to evil loas (his "friends on the other side", as he calls them), and he uses their power to achieve his greedy  goals, convincing the loas to continue working with him by feeding them the souls of innocent victims. He's manipulative and extremely powerful.  ...
8 comments
Read more

Paul D and Sethe's shared trauma

Paul D and Sethe have an extremely complicated relationship that constantly morphs and shifts throughout  Beloved . They spent lots of time at Sweet Home together, and therefore have an established emotional bond. Though a more physical aspect of their relationship develops, the glue holding them together is their shared trauma of living at Sweet Home and of their respective escapes. Generally speaking, relationships held together primarily by shared traumatic experiences are fragile and unstable: Paul D and Sethe's relationship is no exception. Though they understand each other's experiences with slavery, they have little else in common. Crucially, they haven't seen each other in eighteen years, and there are significant gaps in their knowledge what has happened in the other's life in the nearly two decades since their last encounter. Most importantly, Paul D is unaware of what Sethe did in the shed on that fateful day when schoolmaster came to 124. With the presen...
9 comments
Read more

Final thoughts

 Before I get into this, I want to start by pointing out that Jill was #1 on my most likely to die list, and she is the one who died. It feels wrong to congratulate myself, but I am a little bit proud. The ending was quite satisfying. It felt almost too good and peaceful for the end of such a wild and tragic novel. Nearly the entire group survived, they moved on from their ghosts of the past, and they have great resources that they can begin their Earthseed community with. I'm a little upset that Lauren is still in a relationship with Bankole, but it's good that there are so many relationships within their community as they plan for the future. The most surprising part of the ending was when Lauren discovered that Greyson, Emery, and their kids are all sharers. I was not expecting this at all, because sharing was Lauren's most unique trait. However, it does alienate her less from the rest of the group, and it makes the former slaves more united with the rest of the group. T...
Post a Comment
Read more