Skip to main content

Fake Communism and WWII Parallels

 Oceania is clearly a Communist country. In chapters 7-8 there was a strong emphasis on community, with Winston mentioning how risky it was to even take a walk alone because it suggests individuality. However, even with all of the pro-community messaging, 85% of the population lives in slums. The proles seem to be the working class from the pre-revolution world, and are allowed to lead somewhat normal lives as long as they do their jobs. These seems strange to me because Oceania flaunts itself as the perfect communist society, but the proles are on a distinct tier that makes class divides significantly harsher in Oceania than in capitalist society.

I'm not going to pretend like class mobility is very legitimate in our modern society - it's extraordinarily difficult to alter your financial situation so significantly. However, there is at least the prospect of it happening - in Oceania, the divide between the proles and the Party members is impassable. The proles are treated like a different species, which is how the Party justifies their treatment. I can't help but see parallels to Germany in the late 1930s and early 1940s in this justification, as the Nazis also argued that Jews were not really humans. To many, this dehumanization made it feel okay to discriminate against, isolate, and eventually murder Jews. Clearly the proles have more autonomy, space, and access to resources than Jews did in Nazi Germany. However, there are many aspects of this book that are influenced by WWII and I think that the divide between Party members and proles is one of them.

What other details have you noticed in 1984 so far that seem to have been influenced by WWII?

Comments

  1. Anya11 February 2021 at 07:36

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anya11 February 2021 at 07:41

      One thing I'll point out that seems influenced by World War II is the way the government riles up the citizens of Oceania against its foreign enemies. The Party does not view their enemies as individuals, but rather a single dehumanized entity that must be met with extreme hatred. The tactics they use to brainwash the people into sharing this hatred for their enemies, such as brainwashing, (e.g. Two Minutes Hate) are reminiscent of the tactics that the Nazi Party used to rile people up against its enemies.

      Delete
  2. L. Moffitt11 February 2021 at 07:38

    Good post. The fact that the scapegoated enemy is Goldstein, a Jew, suggests ties to Nazi Germany as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Disney perpetuates voodoo stereotypes

In the opening chapters of Mumbo Jumbo , we've been introduced to Papa DaBas, a voodoo priest. In class we talked a bit about the largely negatively perception of voodoo in America. This immediately made me think of the Disney princess film, The Princess and the Frog . This movie is set in New Orleans, and follows a princess who falls in love, blah blah blah...but the villain is a voodoo-practicing witch doctor, Dr. Facilier.  I found it really interesting to look back at Dr. Facilier's character after discussing the American perception of voodoo, because Dr. Facilier is portrayed as a man of pure evil (here's a picture if you haven't seen the movie to show how creepy he is). His soul belongs to evil loas (his "friends on the other side", as he calls them), and he uses their power to achieve his greedy  goals, convincing the loas to continue working with him by feeding them the souls of innocent victims. He's manipulative and extremely powerful.  ...
8 comments
Read more

Paul D and Sethe's shared trauma

Paul D and Sethe have an extremely complicated relationship that constantly morphs and shifts throughout  Beloved . They spent lots of time at Sweet Home together, and therefore have an established emotional bond. Though a more physical aspect of their relationship develops, the glue holding them together is their shared trauma of living at Sweet Home and of their respective escapes. Generally speaking, relationships held together primarily by shared traumatic experiences are fragile and unstable: Paul D and Sethe's relationship is no exception. Though they understand each other's experiences with slavery, they have little else in common. Crucially, they haven't seen each other in eighteen years, and there are significant gaps in their knowledge what has happened in the other's life in the nearly two decades since their last encounter. Most importantly, Paul D is unaware of what Sethe did in the shed on that fateful day when schoolmaster came to 124. With the presen...
9 comments
Read more

Final thoughts

 Before I get into this, I want to start by pointing out that Jill was #1 on my most likely to die list, and she is the one who died. It feels wrong to congratulate myself, but I am a little bit proud. The ending was quite satisfying. It felt almost too good and peaceful for the end of such a wild and tragic novel. Nearly the entire group survived, they moved on from their ghosts of the past, and they have great resources that they can begin their Earthseed community with. I'm a little upset that Lauren is still in a relationship with Bankole, but it's good that there are so many relationships within their community as they plan for the future. The most surprising part of the ending was when Lauren discovered that Greyson, Emery, and their kids are all sharers. I was not expecting this at all, because sharing was Lauren's most unique trait. However, it does alienate her less from the rest of the group, and it makes the former slaves more united with the rest of the group. T...
Post a Comment
Read more