Skip to main content

Fake Communism and WWII Parallels

 Oceania is clearly a Communist country. In chapters 7-8 there was a strong emphasis on community, with Winston mentioning how risky it was to even take a walk alone because it suggests individuality. However, even with all of the pro-community messaging, 85% of the population lives in slums. The proles seem to be the working class from the pre-revolution world, and are allowed to lead somewhat normal lives as long as they do their jobs. These seems strange to me because Oceania flaunts itself as the perfect communist society, but the proles are on a distinct tier that makes class divides significantly harsher in Oceania than in capitalist society.

I'm not going to pretend like class mobility is very legitimate in our modern society - it's extraordinarily difficult to alter your financial situation so significantly. However, there is at least the prospect of it happening - in Oceania, the divide between the proles and the Party members is impassable. The proles are treated like a different species, which is how the Party justifies their treatment. I can't help but see parallels to Germany in the late 1930s and early 1940s in this justification, as the Nazis also argued that Jews were not really humans. To many, this dehumanization made it feel okay to discriminate against, isolate, and eventually murder Jews. Clearly the proles have more autonomy, space, and access to resources than Jews did in Nazi Germany. However, there are many aspects of this book that are influenced by WWII and I think that the divide between Party members and proles is one of them.

What other details have you noticed in 1984 so far that seem to have been influenced by WWII?

Comments

  1. Anya11 February 2021 at 07:36

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anya11 February 2021 at 07:41

      One thing I'll point out that seems influenced by World War II is the way the government riles up the citizens of Oceania against its foreign enemies. The Party does not view their enemies as individuals, but rather a single dehumanized entity that must be met with extreme hatred. The tactics they use to brainwash the people into sharing this hatred for their enemies, such as brainwashing, (e.g. Two Minutes Hate) are reminiscent of the tactics that the Nazi Party used to rile people up against its enemies.

      Delete
  2. L. Moffitt11 February 2021 at 07:38

    Good post. The fact that the scapegoated enemy is Goldstein, a Jew, suggests ties to Nazi Germany as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Final thoughts

 Before I get into this, I want to start by pointing out that Jill was #1 on my most likely to die list, and she is the one who died. It feels wrong to congratulate myself, but I am a little bit proud. The ending was quite satisfying. It felt almost too good and peaceful for the end of such a wild and tragic novel. Nearly the entire group survived, they moved on from their ghosts of the past, and they have great resources that they can begin their Earthseed community with. I'm a little upset that Lauren is still in a relationship with Bankole, but it's good that there are so many relationships within their community as they plan for the future. The most surprising part of the ending was when Lauren discovered that Greyson, Emery, and their kids are all sharers. I was not expecting this at all, because sharing was Lauren's most unique trait. However, it does alienate her less from the rest of the group, and it makes the former slaves more united with the rest of the group. T...
Post a Comment
Read more

Peter Walsh and fake feminism

 I don't think I'm the only one who really dislikes Peter Walsh. He's arrogant, rude, selfish, and just plain annoying. However, the part about him that I despise the most is the way that he makes Clarissa feel. Every time he's around, and even sometimes when he's not, Clarissa feels Peter's judgement. He's living rent-free in her head, and the shame that he makes her feel is unjustified. Now, I'm sure that Peter Walsh would consider himself to be a feminist. His whole issue with Clarissa is that he feels that she has so much wasted potential. He knew her when she was young and radical, and he doesn't seem to be able to comprehend how she ended up as a housewife married to a conservative politician. He looks down on her for the way her life has turned out, and this is where we run into some issues.  It's one thing to support and uplift someone who has been forced to compromise their lifestyle because of the patriarchy - it's another thing to ...
5 comments
Read more

Third time's the charm

I think we can all agree that Janie hasn't had the best of luck when it comes to husbands. First she is forced into her marriage with Logan Killucks, and then she runs away with Joe, who seems to be a Prince Charming but really just wants to use her. As a reader, I started out pretty optimistic about Janie's life, but by the time she meets Tea Cake I was feeling more cynical. She's had two failed relationships that started out somewhat positively: what's to say this one won't end like the others? Janie's first failed marriage can be blamed primarily on Grandma, as she is the one who forced Janie into the relationship in the first place. Janie was too young and immature to marry, and didn't even like Logan to begin with. That is not a good foundation for a long and happy marriage. Though Logan is painted as villainous in their relationship, he doesn't really do anything wrong. He expects out of Janie what a man would generally expect out of a wife in th...
6 comments
Read more