Skip to main content

1,984 reasons why I hate Orwell

Sorry, that was clickbait. I don't actually have a list of 1,984 reasons to hate Orwell, but I do have some big problems with him that I'll be hashing out here (aka ranting).

  1. He is obsessed with torture. 1984 is a study in human nature. However, Orwell chooses to study human nature through the lens of torture. I understand his desire to make Oceania such a deeply horrific society, but I think he goes far past the point of appropriateness. He seems like part of that group of creepy old-school psychologists who thought that any lengths could be taken in the name of science. Even though everything in 1984 is obviously theoretical, it's unsettling to me that Orwell has mentally worked out so many intricate details about the brink of human sanity in relation to torture. Creep.
    1. He is sexist. I think I've already written a post about this one, but I'll say it again: there is no female independence in 1984. All the social and political leaders are men, and the only female characters appear as motherly figures or sexual objects. The fact that Winston doesn't even encounter any other women in his life besides his neighbor, his mom, and Julia is ridiculous and unrealistic to the point where it's clear that Orwell is unwilling to give any of his "precious time" to creating well-developed and multi-dimensional female characters. It's kind of ironic that he did so much writing to promote socialism but didn't even see women as equals.
    2. He is (probably) racist and homophobic. I made these deductions from subtleties in the book, but also from the fact that he was a white man born in 1903 (he was also born in India because his dad was working in the Imperial Civil Service - not a good look). In the book, there's only one comment made about sexuality, but it's a derogatory comment about people in the labor camps having same-sex relationships. It's mentioned alongside other degenerate behavior that people in these camps resort to, so to me that makes Orwell's views of gay people pretty clear. He also never mentions racial diversity within Oceania (which is impossible because Oceania is North America and England, which had lots of racial diversity when this book was written), and the only racially-charged comments he makes are gross stereotypes of prisoners from Eurasia and Eastasia. So, lots of bad things going on here. Once again, ironic that his idea of equality has so many asterisks.
    Those are my three biggest reasons for disliking Orwell. I'm sure if I thought about it for long enough I could get 1,984 but I think this will do for now. Do you agree with my criticisms? Are there some big ones that I missed?

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    How Disney perpetuates voodoo stereotypes

    In the opening chapters of Mumbo Jumbo , we've been introduced to Papa DaBas, a voodoo priest. In class we talked a bit about the largely negatively perception of voodoo in America. This immediately made me think of the Disney princess film, The Princess and the Frog . This movie is set in New Orleans, and follows a princess who falls in love, blah blah blah...but the villain is a voodoo-practicing witch doctor, Dr. Facilier.  I found it really interesting to look back at Dr. Facilier's character after discussing the American perception of voodoo, because Dr. Facilier is portrayed as a man of pure evil (here's a picture if you haven't seen the movie to show how creepy he is). His soul belongs to evil loas (his "friends on the other side", as he calls them), and he uses their power to achieve his greedy  goals, convincing the loas to continue working with him by feeding them the souls of innocent victims. He's manipulative and extremely powerful.  ...
    8 comments
    Read more

    Paul D and Sethe's shared trauma

    Paul D and Sethe have an extremely complicated relationship that constantly morphs and shifts throughout  Beloved . They spent lots of time at Sweet Home together, and therefore have an established emotional bond. Though a more physical aspect of their relationship develops, the glue holding them together is their shared trauma of living at Sweet Home and of their respective escapes. Generally speaking, relationships held together primarily by shared traumatic experiences are fragile and unstable: Paul D and Sethe's relationship is no exception. Though they understand each other's experiences with slavery, they have little else in common. Crucially, they haven't seen each other in eighteen years, and there are significant gaps in their knowledge what has happened in the other's life in the nearly two decades since their last encounter. Most importantly, Paul D is unaware of what Sethe did in the shed on that fateful day when schoolmaster came to 124. With the presen...
    9 comments
    Read more

    'Hard-boiled': a post about egg metaphors

    "It is awfully easy to be hard-boiled about everything in the daytime, but at night it is another thing." This line uttered by Jake is fascinating to me, and not only because he compares himself to a cooked egg. First of all, this is one of the few scenes where we see Jake admitting that he has any emotions - he spends the majority of the novel trying to be nonchalant and as stereotypically masculine as possible. We mentioned in class that a perk of Hemingway's bland style is that emotional breakthroughs are much more significant. We experience one of those breakthroughs here, where Jake is finally admitting that his personality and attitude is a façade that he hides behind. However, the thing I really want to talk about is the term 'hard-boiled' and why I think it's such an accurate description of Jake. So, I'm assuming we're all familiar with hard-boiled eggs. Hard shells, soft insides, cooked in pots of boiling water. By calling himself hard-boiled,...
    8 comments
    Read more